हिंदी English

China rejects WHO’s plan for the second phase of investigation of Kovid-19 origin

China on Thursday rejected the World Health Organization’s (WHO) plan for a second phase of its investigation into the origins of the coronavirus, a top health official said, including the hypothesis that it could have escaped from a Chinese laboratory.

The WHO this month proposed the second phase of a study into the origins of the coronavirus in China, including audits of laboratories and markets in the city of Wuhan, demanding transparency from authorities.

“We will not accept such an origin-tracing plan because it disregards common sense in some aspects and disregards science,” Zeng Yixin, deputy minister of the National Health Commission (NHC), told reporters.

Zeng said he was astonished when he first read the WHO plan because it listed the hypothesis that Chinese violations of laboratory protocols leaked the virus during research.

The head of the WHO said earlier in July that investigations into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic in China were being hampered by a lack of raw data in the first days of the outbreak there.

Zeng reiterated China’s position that some data may not be fully shared due to privacy concerns.

Zeng said, “We hope that the WHO will seriously review the views and suggestions given by Chinese experts and in fact treat the origin tracing of the COVID-19 virus as a scientific matter and get rid of political interference.” Will give.”

China opposes the politicization of the study, he said.

There is controversy among experts regarding the origin of the virus.

The first known case was reported in December 2019 in the central Chinese city of Wuhan. The virus is believed to have passed to humans from animals being sold for food in a city market.

In May, US President Joe Biden ordered aides to find answers to questions about the origins, saying that the US

Intelligence agencies were pursuing potentially rival theories, including the possibility of a laboratory accident in China.

Zeng, along with other officials and Chinese experts at the news conference, urged the WHO to expand origin-tracing efforts to other countries beyond China.

“We believe that the probability of a laboratory leak is very small and it is not necessary to invest much energy and efforts in this regard,” said Liang Wanian, leader of the Chinese team in the WHO’s joint expert team. He said more animals should be studied, especially in countries with bat populations.

However, Liang said the laboratory leak hypothesis cannot be discounted entirely, but suggested that if evidence is warranted, other countries could look into the possibility that it leaked from their laboratories.

A major part of the lab leak theory focuses on the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)’s decision in 2019 to take its gene sequence and sample database offline.

When asked about the decision, WIV professor and director of its National Biosecurity Laboratory, Yuan Zhiming, told reporters that currently the databases were only shared internally due to cyberattack concerns.

Dear reader,

Business Standard has always worked hard to provide updated information and commentary on events that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering has further strengthened our resolve and commitment to these ideals. Even during these difficult times arising out of COVID-19, we are committed to keeping you informed and updated with relevant news, authoritative views and sharp comments on relevant relevant issues.
However, we have a request.

As we grapple with the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more so that we can continue to provide you with more quality content. Our subscription model has received an encouraging response from many of you who have subscribed to our online content. Subscribing to more of our online content can only help us achieve our goals of providing you with better and more relevant content. We believe in independent, unbiased and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practice the journalism we’re committed to.

support quality journalism and Subscribe to Business Standard.

digital editor

.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *